Skip to main content Skip to main menu

Review of the Design of Public Spaces Standards

After AODA standards come into force, they must be reviewed at least every five (5) years. In other words, the AODA Standards Development Committee that created each standard must also review it every five (5) years, or more often. The Committee must then submit a draft of their review to the Minister in charge of the AODA. The Minister must make the review available to the public so that people can comment on it. Based on those public reactions, the committee revises the proposed standard and resubmits it to the minister. The minister must recommend to the Lieutenant Governor that the standard be accepted in whole, in part, or with modifications. The first review of the Design of Public Spaces Standards should have begun in 2017.

Review of the Design of public spaces Standards

In this needed first review, the AODA Design of public spaces Standards Development Committee should outline improvements to make public spaces accessible for people with disabilities by 2025. The Committee should recommend changes to the standards to reduce the accessibility barriers in public spaces, including:

In addition, the Committee should recommend changes to the standards to identify, remove, and prevent other barriers that people with disabilities face when they attempt to enter and use public spaces. For example, the Third Review of the AODA points out remaining barriers in public spaces, including  at the stage of designing spaces. The government can mitigate some of these barriers through stronger enforcement of existing AODA standards. On the other hand, other barrier removal requires changes to the standards.

Accessibility Ecosystem Model for Updating AODA Standards

Furthermore, the AODA Information and Communications Standards Development Committee reports that the current procedure for creating and reviewing AODA standards cannot keep pace with modern technology. While methods of creating and using information change rapidly, current standards cannot provide enough guidance to organizations about how to ensure that the information they produce is accessible. As a result, the Committee recommends an alternative system for developing, updating, and enforcing AODA standards. This new system, called the Accessibility Ecosystem Model, would have three components:

The model would affect not only the Information and Communications Standards, but other existing and future standards. As a result, the needed first review of the Design of public spaces Standards should explore how the accessibility ecosystem model could impact the Design of public spaces Standards.